- http://facebook.comhttp://msn.com
Network/Cable Television
ABC News
147 Columbus Ave., New York, NY 10023
Phone: 212-456-7777
General e-mail: netaudr@abc.com
Nightline: nightline@abcnews.com
20/20: 2020@abc.comCBS News
524 W. 57 St., New York, NY 10019
Phone: 212-975-4321
Fax: 212-975-1893
Email forms for all CBS news programs
CBS Evening News: evening@cbsnews.com
The Early Show: earlyshow@cbs.com
60 Minutes II: 60m@cbsnews.com
48 Hours: 48hours@cbsnews.com
Face The Nation: ftn@cbsnews.comCNBC
900 Sylvan Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632
Phone: (201) 735-2622
Fax: (201) 583-5453
Email: info@cnbc.com
CNN
One CNN Center, Box 105366, Atlanta, GA 30303-5366
Phone: 404-827-1500
Fax: 404-827-1784
Email forms for all CNN news programsFox News Channel
1211 Ave. of the Americas, New York, NY 10036
Phone: (212) 301-3000
Fax: (212) 301-4229
comments@foxnews.com List of Email addresses for all Fox News Channel programs
Special Report with Bret Baier: Special@foxnews.com
FOX Report with Shepard Smith: Foxreport@foxnews.com
The O'Reilly Factor: Oreilly@foxnews.com
Hannity: Hannity@foxnews.com,
On the Record with Greta: Ontherecord@foxnews.com
Glenn Beck: GlennBeck@foxnews.comMSNBC/NBC
30 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, NY 10112
Phone: (212) 664-4444
Fax: (212) 664-4426
List of Email addresses for all MSNBC/NBC news programs
Dateline NBC: dateline@nbcuni.com
Hardball with Chris Matthews: hardball@msnbc.com
MSNBC Reports with Joe Scarborough: joe@msnbc.com
NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams: nightly@nbc.com
NBC News Today: today@nbc.comPBS
2100 Crystal Drive, Arlington VA 22202
Phone: 703-739-5000
Fax: 703-739-5777 The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer: newshour@pbs.orgNational Radio Programs
635 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20001-3753
Phone: 202-513-2000
Fax: 202-513-3329
E-mail: Alicia Shephard, Ombudsman ombudsman@npr.org
List of Email addresses for all NPR news programs
The Rush Limbaugh Show
1270 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020
Phone (on air): 800-282-2882
Fax: 212-445-3963
E-mail: ElRushbo@eibnet.com
Sean Hannity Show
Phone (on air): 800-941-7326
Sean Hannity:212-613-3800
James Grisham, Producer: 212-613-3832 E-mail: Phil Boyce, Program Director phil.boyce@citcomm.comNational Newspapers
The Los Angeles Times
202 West First Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Phone: 800-528-4637 or 213-237-5000
Fax: 213-237-4712
L.A. Times Contact Information by Department
Letters to the Editor: letters@latimes.com
Readers' Representative: readers.rep@latimes.com
The New York Times
620 8th Ave., New York, NY 10018
Phone: 212-556-1234
D.C. Bureau phone: 202-862-0300
Fax: 212-556-3690
Letters to the Editor (for publication): letters@nytimes.com
Write to the news editors: news-tips@nytimes.com
Corrections: senioreditor@nytimes.com
New York Times Contact Information by Department
How to Contact New York Times Reporters and Editors
USA Today
7950 Jones Branch Dr., McLean, VA 22108
Phone: 703-854-3400
Fax: 703-854-2078 Letters to the Editor: editor@usatoday.com
Give feedback to USA Today
The Wall Street Journal
1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036
Phone: 212-416-2000
Fax: 212-416-2658
Letters to the Editor: wsj.ltrs@wsj.com
Comment on News Articles: wsjcontact@dowjones.com
The Washington Post
1150 15th St., NW, Washington, DC 20071
Phone: 202-334-6000
Fax: 202-334-5075
Letters to the Editor: letters@washpost.com
Ombudsman: ombudsman@washpost.com
Contact Washington Post Writers and EditorsMagazines
Newsweek
251 W 57th Street, New York, NY 10019
Phone: 212-445-4000
Fax: 212-445-5068
Letters to the Editor: letters@newsweek.com
Time
Time & Life Bldg., Rockefeller Center, 1271 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020
Phone: 212-522-1212
Fax: 212-522-0003
Letters to the Editor letters@time.com
U.S. News & World Report
1050 Thomas Jefferson St., NW, Washington, DC 20007
Phone: 202-955-2000
Fax: 202-955-2049
Letters to the Editor letters@usnews.comNews Services / Wires
450 West 33rd St., New York, NY 10001
Phone: 212-621-1500
Fax: 212-621-1723
General Questions and Comments: info@ap.org
Partial Contact Information for the Associated Press by Department and Bureau
Reuters
Three Times Square, New York, NY 10036
Telephone: 646-223-4000 Reuters Editorial Feedback
United Press International
1133 19th Street, NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20036
Telephone: 202-898-8000
FAX: 202-898-8048 Comments and Tips: tips@upi.com
http://youtube.com
Thursday 21 April 2011
Links and Mirrors
Saturday 16 April 2011
JFB Online Promotions Soliciting Parents
Steve Sedlar began soliciting for pictures of boys (and their home addresses) by spamming child/parent oriented usenet groups in April 1999 (Coincidently, the precise date was April 13 - the same date he was to open his LoganSperman2 account on YouTube seven years later).
Calling himself Steven Lucas (presumably after two of his heroes, Steven Spielberg and George Lucas) he concocted the story that he was working for the promotions department of a company called Just For Boys. Just For Boys (JFB) supposedly traded in clothing and accessories for boys (wristbands?) and was seeking out parents of boys (it's always boys, never girls) to submit photographs of their children to their website. JFB also offered to send clothing to the boys to model in, be photographed and then have the pictures sent back to Steven. The "models" were promised that they could retain any of the clothing and accessories if they so wished.
"Hi, we are starting a new online sales area of our website which sells clothing and accessories for boys (all ages from tots to teens), called JUST FOR BOYS. We are looking for parents of kids that would like to model some of our items and be featured on our website"
 |
| JFB1998 |
"Hi, we are starting a new online sales area of our website which sells clothing and accessories for boys (all ages from tots to teens), called JUST FOR BOYS. We are looking for parents of kids that would like to model some of our items and be featured on our website"
Steve Sedlar was immediately brought to task by several other posters yet he continued to spam this post for several more days - and each time the opposition grew stronger and more vociferous.
"He doesn't direct you to the web page so you can see his products, and he gives you a hotmail address, not a corporate one, where you should send the pictures. Parents of boys, please be cautious. Something sounds wrong about this." says someone called Davidson.
"Please list your website address. Both your email addresses are free email
addresses. Is this really a legit business?" asks Sara.Steve attempts to explain why his "legitamate" company was using a hotmail email account and hosting its website on a free web server.
"Hi, we are currently using Hotmail (and DejaNews for posting) because we are in the middle of moving our site, we needed a consistant address that would not be affected by any movies. When we secure our domain name we will use another email address as well as our Hotmail one. We have had our contest page online for over a year and are just starting to introduce some online sales. You can currently find our site on the Prodigy server at http://pages.prodigy.com/contest If you have any other questions or comments, please let me know. Thanks!"
"Personally, I wouldn't touch that message with a ten-foot pole." opines concerned mother, Vicki Surratt.
"I just did a search for JFB Online Promotions and can't find anything on them. I agree with Davidson that this sounds way fishy!" exclaims Red.
Feeling angry and incensed that people may even be suggesting that he is a pervert and spammer, Steve responds with this very long winded and indignant reply:
I wanted to address the issues brought up about our previous post in this group. First, we are a legitamate company that is listed in the ComFind Internet company directory, (although the phone number they have for us is not currant). Our company name is JUST FOR BOYS, not JFB Online Promotions.The latter is just the division I work in, promoting the online presence of JFB. We have had a mail order division for over 2 years, and have had an online presence with our contests for over a year. The message posted was NOT an advertisement, or "spam". It was directed at the participants of this parenting group. The intent of the post was NOT to sell anything, and we did not include a web URL because that would imply that we were, when our purpose was just to find some parents and kids that would be interested in being models for some of our online products. For the record, our website (which has been primarily contest-oriented) is up on the Prodigy server at http://pages.prodigy.com/contest
"Personally, I wouldn't touch that message with a ten-foot pole." opines concerned mother, Vicki Surratt.
"I just did a search for JFB Online Promotions and can't find anything on them. I agree with Davidson that this sounds way fishy!" exclaims Red.
Feeling angry and incensed that people may even be suggesting that he is a pervert and spammer, Steve responds with this very long winded and indignant reply:
I wanted to address the issues brought up about our previous post in this group. First, we are a legitamate company that is listed in the ComFind Internet company directory, (although the phone number they have for us is not currant). Our company name is JUST FOR BOYS, not JFB Online Promotions.The latter is just the division I work in, promoting the online presence of JFB. We have had a mail order division for over 2 years, and have had an online presence with our contests for over a year. The message posted was NOT an advertisement, or "spam". It was directed at the participants of this parenting group. The intent of the post was NOT to sell anything, and we did not include a web URL because that would imply that we were, when our purpose was just to find some parents and kids that would be interested in being models for some of our online products. For the record, our website (which has been primarily contest-oriented) is up on the Prodigy server at http://pages.prodigy.com/contest
We have been involved in ongoing legal consultations concerning the domain www.justforboys.com (which is now owned by a porn business) about using our company name, but as for now our site remains on the Prodigy web server. The reason we use Hotmail for email contacts at this time is because of the same reason, we are in the process of claiming our permanant web domain, and the HotMail address will be active regardless of our web host, which is important. We use DejaNews to post for this reason also, in addition to the fact that the DejaNews address will prevent us from being spammed which ties up are ability to access legitamate email inquiries. We are just recently (Easter) started offering some of our products online for sale in addition to the contests. For our PRINT CATALOGS, we ONLY use models hired from agencies. I only work in the online division, so I might have been wrong about union. But I do know that we do NOT hire independant models for print work, we only use those who are drawn from talent agencies. We decided that since we recieived so may requests about modeling opportunities from our contests, we would use photos submitted to us by our customers wearing our products instead of professional models for our online sales pages. We are not budgeted to pay for professional models for online sales pages, and saw this opportunity to select "real" people send in pictures, and reimbuse them by letting them keep the items we send for them to model, and the exposure they would get by being on our website. We are not in the business of talent management or modeling, BUT any requests we would get from talent agencies or management about any models on our site would be forwarded to the parent/guardian. We also do NOT reveal any personal info like address or email address to the public. As far as sending items to be modeled, we do not require a street address, a PO Box or any other address is just as suitable. We also are not asking for any money for this. We wanted to ask around to find some kids that might want to be model for our site to launch the WebModels program which will be available only to customers who buy the products and would like to have their kid's picture on our site. As far as the dangers of digital pictures versus print pictures, there is no real difference, since anyone who wishes to "alter" any picture in any way can easily scan a hard copy of a picture into digital form. An online picture is as safe, if not safer, as a picture of your kid in his school yearbook, or in the local newspaper or magazine, since those meadia forms get more circulation than a website. I hope this helps to clear up some of the concerns that various people here have had. If not, or if anyone has any other questions or comments, please feel free to send them to me, privately or publically. Thanks!
Steven J. Lucas
JFB Online Promotions
Steven becomes more irate and defensive.....
I will say this once again, the post I made was NOT advertisement. I posted
it here because it had to do with PARENTING. I have seen posts before about
kids modeling, and I was letting parents know of this. If it is non-profit it
certainly is not against any FAQ. If it is, than half of all other posts here
are in the same category, why don't you direct your attack to them? For
example, every time someone mentions any brand name in a post, or about a
contest, or about a commercial website, I guess that, in your definition,
would be SPAMMING and/or "advertising" as well. Why is that not against the
FAQ? Because it is ridiculous, that's why. If someone ELSE posted the message
I did, would that be advertising? It is just letting other parents know of
something they might be interested in. It is ON TOPIC, and NON-PROFIT. Now
thanks to someone who obviously has too much free time, the Hotmail email
address I mentioned in the original post has been suspended, which now will
just take up more of our time to straighten things out with them, (since they
obviossly did not even check into the matter before suspending the account).
The post was NOT even posted from the Hotmail address, and the address was
not even mine, but of an entirely different outfit who handles contests. We
are in the process of finding out who is falsely reporting us as "abusers"
and will take legal action against those individuals. Yes, it is against most
every providers' rules to SPAM and abuse the Internet, and rightly so, but it
is also against the rules, and a CRIME, to ruin someone's integrity as well
as damages to someone's business, by false accusations such as this. Yes,
TURN IN SPAMMERS and those making ILLEGAL postings and activity, (last time I
browsed this group. there were MANY), but make sure you are not going after
someone who is innocent, and consider the damages that can cause if you do.
It is NOT something anyone should do frivilously, and should be taken very
seriously. If you want to turn in someone, why not scroll up and turn in the
sicko's the perverts, illegal spammers, etc., that no one even gives a second
thought to? Why attack me who just posted a note about a website with a new
non-profit modeling program, or about a contest we are running, etc. THAT is
something I just do not understand. It is beyond nit-picking. If someone has
a personal grudge against us, please just let us know and we can hopefully
work things out. I just canot conceive the idea of passing up the porn posts,
illegal posts, money making scemes, and all of the other posts which CAN
cause serious harm to kids and anyone else, and target me, who was just
basically posting about a website that parents and kids interested in
modeling would be interested in. If you have so much free time, please use
some to explain that to me.
Steven Lucas
______________
Anyone familiar with Steven's Logan Sperman
character
on YouTube will instantly see the remarkable similarities in the the writing styles of "Steven Lucas" and "Logan Sperman".
[This post will be updated soon]
JFB Online Promotions Soliciting Parents
Steve Sedlar began soliciting for pictures of boys (and their home addresses) by spamming child/parent oriented usenet groups in April 1999 (Coincidently, the precise date was April 13 - the same date he was to open his LoganSperman2 account on YouTube seven years later).
Calling himself Steven Lucas (presumably after two of his heroes, Steven Spielberg and George Lucas) he concocted the story that he was working for the promotions department of a company called Just For Boys. Just For Boys (JFB) supposedly traded in clothing and accessories for boys (wristbands?) and was seeking out parents of boys (it's always boys, never girls) to submit photographs of their children to their website. JFB also offered to send clothing to the boys to model in, be photographed and then have the pictures sent back to Steven. The "models" were promised that they could retain any of the clothing and accessories if they so wished.
"Hi, we are starting a new online sales area of our website which sells clothing and accessories for boys (all ages from tots to teens), called JUST FOR BOYS. We are looking for parents of kids that would like to model some of our items and be featured on our website"
|
| JFB1998 |
"Hi, we are starting a new online sales area of our website which sells clothing and accessories for boys (all ages from tots to teens), called JUST FOR BOYS. We are looking for parents of kids that would like to model some of our items and be featured on our website"
Steve Sedlar was immediately brought to task by several other posters yet he continued to spam this post for several more days - and each time the opposition grew stronger and more vociferous.
"He doesn't direct you to the web page so you can see his products, and he gives you a hotmail address, not a corporate one, where you should send the pictures. Parents of boys, please be cautious. Something sounds wrong about this." says someone called Davidson.
"Please list your website address. Both your email addresses are free email
addresses. Is this really a legit business?" asks Sara.Steve attempts to explain why his "legitamate" company was using a hotmail email account and hosting its website on a free web server.
"Hi, we are currently using Hotmail (and DejaNews for posting) because we are in the middle of moving our site, we needed a consistant address that would not be affected by any movies. When we secure our domain name we will use another email address as well as our Hotmail one. We have had our contest page online for over a year and are just starting to introduce some online sales. You can currently find our site on the Prodigy server at http://pages.prodigy.com/contest If you have any other questions or comments, please let me know. Thanks!"
"Personally, I wouldn't touch that message with a ten-foot pole." opines concerned mother, Vicki Surratt.
"I just did a search for JFB Online Promotions and can't find anything on them. I agree with Davidson that this sounds way fishy!" exclaims Red.
Feeling angry and incensed that people may even be suggesting that he is a pervert and spammer, Steve responds with this very long winded and indignant reply:
I wanted to address the issues brought up about our previous post in this group. First, we are a legitamate company that is listed in the ComFind Internet company directory, (although the phone number they have for us is not currant). Our company name is JUST FOR BOYS, not JFB Online Promotions.The latter is just the division I work in, promoting the online presence of JFB. We have had a mail order division for over 2 years, and have had an online presence with our contests for over a year. The message posted was NOT an advertisement, or "spam". It was directed at the participants of this parenting group. The intent of the post was NOT to sell anything, and we did not include a web URL because that would imply that we were, when our purpose was just to find some parents and kids that would be interested in being models for some of our online products. For the record, our website (which has been primarily contest-oriented) is up on the Prodigy server at http://pages.prodigy.com/contest
"Personally, I wouldn't touch that message with a ten-foot pole." opines concerned mother, Vicki Surratt.
"I just did a search for JFB Online Promotions and can't find anything on them. I agree with Davidson that this sounds way fishy!" exclaims Red.
Feeling angry and incensed that people may even be suggesting that he is a pervert and spammer, Steve responds with this very long winded and indignant reply:
I wanted to address the issues brought up about our previous post in this group. First, we are a legitamate company that is listed in the ComFind Internet company directory, (although the phone number they have for us is not currant). Our company name is JUST FOR BOYS, not JFB Online Promotions.The latter is just the division I work in, promoting the online presence of JFB. We have had a mail order division for over 2 years, and have had an online presence with our contests for over a year. The message posted was NOT an advertisement, or "spam". It was directed at the participants of this parenting group. The intent of the post was NOT to sell anything, and we did not include a web URL because that would imply that we were, when our purpose was just to find some parents and kids that would be interested in being models for some of our online products. For the record, our website (which has been primarily contest-oriented) is up on the Prodigy server at http://pages.prodigy.com/contest
We have been involved in ongoing legal consultations concerning the domain www.justforboys.com (which is now owned by a porn business) about using our company name, but as for now our site remains on the Prodigy web server. The reason we use Hotmail for email contacts at this time is because of the same reason, we are in the process of claiming our permanant web domain, and the HotMail address will be active regardless of our web host, which is important. We use DejaNews to post for this reason also, in addition to the fact that the DejaNews address will prevent us from being spammed which ties up are ability to access legitamate email inquiries. We are just recently (Easter) started offering some of our products online for sale in addition to the contests. For our PRINT CATALOGS, we ONLY use models hired from agencies. I only work in the online division, so I might have been wrong about union. But I do know that we do NOT hire independant models for print work, we only use those who are drawn from talent agencies. We decided that since we recieived so may requests about modeling opportunities from our contests, we would use photos submitted to us by our customers wearing our products instead of professional models for our online sales pages. We are not budgeted to pay for professional models for online sales pages, and saw this opportunity to select "real" people send in pictures, and reimbuse them by letting them keep the items we send for them to model, and the exposure they would get by being on our website. We are not in the business of talent management or modeling, BUT any requests we would get from talent agencies or management about any models on our site would be forwarded to the parent/guardian. We also do NOT reveal any personal info like address or email address to the public. As far as sending items to be modeled, we do not require a street address, a PO Box or any other address is just as suitable. We also are not asking for any money for this. We wanted to ask around to find some kids that might want to be model for our site to launch the WebModels program which will be available only to customers who buy the products and would like to have their kid's picture on our site. As far as the dangers of digital pictures versus print pictures, there is no real difference, since anyone who wishes to "alter" any picture in any way can easily scan a hard copy of a picture into digital form. An online picture is as safe, if not safer, as a picture of your kid in his school yearbook, or in the local newspaper or magazine, since those meadia forms get more circulation than a website. I hope this helps to clear up some of the concerns that various people here have had. If not, or if anyone has any other questions or comments, please feel free to send them to me, privately or publically. Thanks!
Steven J. Lucas
JFB Online Promotions
Steven becomes more irate and defensive.....
I will say this once again, the post I made was NOT advertisement. I posted
it here because it had to do with PARENTING. I have seen posts before about
kids modeling, and I was letting parents know of this. If it is non-profit it
certainly is not against any FAQ. If it is, than half of all other posts here
are in the same category, why don't you direct your attack to them? For
example, every time someone mentions any brand name in a post, or about a
contest, or about a commercial website, I guess that, in your definition,
would be SPAMMING and/or "advertising" as well. Why is that not against the
FAQ? Because it is ridiculous, that's why. If someone ELSE posted the message
I did, would that be advertising? It is just letting other parents know of
something they might be interested in. It is ON TOPIC, and NON-PROFIT. Now
thanks to someone who obviously has too much free time, the Hotmail email
address I mentioned in the original post has been suspended, which now will
just take up more of our time to straighten things out with them, (since they
obviossly did not even check into the matter before suspending the account).
The post was NOT even posted from the Hotmail address, and the address was
not even mine, but of an entirely different outfit who handles contests. We
are in the process of finding out who is falsely reporting us as "abusers"
and will take legal action against those individuals. Yes, it is against most
every providers' rules to SPAM and abuse the Internet, and rightly so, but it
is also against the rules, and a CRIME, to ruin someone's integrity as well
as damages to someone's business, by false accusations such as this. Yes,
TURN IN SPAMMERS and those making ILLEGAL postings and activity, (last time I
browsed this group. there were MANY), but make sure you are not going after
someone who is innocent, and consider the damages that can cause if you do.
It is NOT something anyone should do frivilously, and should be taken very
seriously. If you want to turn in someone, why not scroll up and turn in the
sicko's the perverts, illegal spammers, etc., that no one even gives a second
thought to? Why attack me who just posted a note about a website with a new
non-profit modeling program, or about a contest we are running, etc. THAT is
something I just do not understand. It is beyond nit-picking. If someone has
a personal grudge against us, please just let us know and we can hopefully
work things out. I just canot conceive the idea of passing up the porn posts,
illegal posts, money making scemes, and all of the other posts which CAN
cause serious harm to kids and anyone else, and target me, who was just
basically posting about a website that parents and kids interested in
modeling would be interested in. If you have so much free time, please use
some to explain that to me.
Steven Lucas
______________
Anyone familiar with Steven's Logan Sperman
character
on YouTube will instantly see the remarkable similarities in the the writing styles of "Steven Lucas" and "Logan Sperman".
[This post will be updated soon]
Wednesday 13 April 2011
Name This Child
A lot of people are genuinely concerned for the safety of the child in the video below.
If you know anything about this boy please contact your local police.
Name This Child
A lot of people are genuinely concerned for the safety of the child in the video below.
If you know anything about this boy please contact your local police.
Friday 8 April 2011
STEVE SEDLAR ON CHILDREN HAVING ORGASMS
"Steven uses lots of different usernames on his comp, some are even females...."
Best Boy Movies with a boy climax?
Posted by Anakinboy10 on 2003-March-28 09:30:29, Friday
ok u know what i mean, the big 'o', and lots of mainstream movies do have boys having one. i.e. Leolo, lots of others are listed as having some steamy boy scenes- but what about ones with the boy getting to that point? leolo has a good one when the woman is 'handling' him in the distance but it couldve been better. lots of flicks get the boys in bed with someone and act out some of it- but never act out the big 'o'. i say if they have them doing that much and they go that far, (all of the thrusting- even actualy in the nude sometimes) why not finish it? clint eastwood directed his own son having one in that one movie- but didnt seem realistic at all since he didnt seem to have any reaction- wouldnt there be jit a bit more noise out of him, and, erm, movement? and more intense face expression at that point? they act like it just 'hapened' uneventfully. same with the movie 'happiness', he doesnt even flinch- is that even realitic? maybe for a real little boy- i dunno? any wayz any one know any other movies to l00k for?
ab
After reading the above quotation made to the notorious pedophile forum, Boychat, I can now fully appreciate why Steve Sedlar/Anakinboy10 decided to use the name, Logan SPERMan. Sperman is a corruption of the name Lerman, as in Logan Lerman the former child actor. Steve Sedlar clearly enjoys the thought of children having the "big o".
STEVE SEDLAR ON CHILDREN HAVING ORGASMS
"Steven uses lots of different usernames on his comp, some are even females...."
Best Boy Movies with a boy climax?
Posted by Anakinboy10 on 2003-March-28 09:30:29, Friday
ok u know what i mean, the big 'o', and lots of mainstream movies do have boys having one. i.e. Leolo, lots of others are listed as having some steamy boy scenes- but what about ones with the boy getting to that point? leolo has a good one when the woman is 'handling' him in the distance but it couldve been better. lots of flicks get the boys in bed with someone and act out some of it- but never act out the big 'o'. i say if they have them doing that much and they go that far, (all of the thrusting- even actualy in the nude sometimes) why not finish it? clint eastwood directed his own son having one in that one movie- but didnt seem realistic at all since he didnt seem to have any reaction- wouldnt there be jit a bit more noise out of him, and, erm, movement? and more intense face expression at that point? they act like it just 'hapened' uneventfully. same with the movie 'happiness', he doesnt even flinch- is that even realitic? maybe for a real little boy- i dunno? any wayz any one know any other movies to l00k for?
ab
After reading the above quotation made to the notorious pedophile forum, Boychat, I can now fully appreciate why Steve Sedlar/Anakinboy10 decided to use the name, Logan SPERMan. Sperman is a corruption of the name Lerman, as in Logan Lerman the former child actor. Steve Sedlar clearly enjoys the thought of children having the "big o".
STEVE SEDLAR ON CHILDREN HAVING ORGASMS
"Steven uses lots of different usernames on his comp, some are even females...."
Best Boy Movies with a boy climax?
Posted by Anakinboy10 on 2003-March-28 09:30:29, Friday
ok u know what i mean, the big 'o', and lots of mainstream movies do have boys having one. i.e. Leolo, lots of others are listed as having some steamy boy scenes- but what about ones with the boy getting to that point? leolo has a good one when the woman is 'handling' him in the distance but it couldve been better. lots of flicks get the boys in bed with someone and act out some of it- but never act out the big 'o'. i say if they have them doing that much and they go that far, (all of the thrusting- even actualy in the nude sometimes) why not finish it? clint eastwood directed his own son having one in that one movie- but didnt seem realistic at all since he didnt seem to have any reaction- wouldnt there be jit a bit more noise out of him, and, erm, movement? and more intense face expression at that point? they act like it just 'hapened' uneventfully. same with the movie 'happiness', he doesnt even flinch- is that even realitic? maybe for a real little boy- i dunno? any wayz any one know any other movies to l00k for?
ab
After reading the above quotation made to the notorious pedophile forum, Boychat, I can now fully appreciate why Steve Sedlar/Anakinboy10 decided to use the name, Logan SPERMan. Sperman is a corruption of the name Lerman, as in Logan Lerman the former child actor. Steve Sedlar clearly enjoys the thought of children having the "big o".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)